【專訪】華東師范年夜學人文甜心一包養網社會科學學院院長楊國榮：中國傳統哲學蘊含何種人權思惟？

Although Chinese traditional philosophy has fewer people’s personal rights and feelings to directly express their rights and interests, it has the concept of “benevolence and way”. Confucius’s focus concept is benevolence, and its connotation not only confirms human basic rights, but also determines the wide value of human beings. In this regard, the view of RendaoThe idea is exactly the same as the meaning of rights. Rights awareness only focuses on personal rights and personal benefits, while benevolence and destiny pay attention to the rights owned by people, and Bao Haimei also focuses on the wide range of values ​​that everyone has. Rendao’s dedication helps to prevent the separation and conflict between individuals.

Another aspect of human rights related to human rights, contact and understanding of humanity. The principle of benevolence is to determine that every person has an inherent value as connotation, and it also contains humanity. Although there are differences in the specific understanding of humanitarian connotation, it is the mainstream trend of Chinese philosophy, especially Confucianism. At the same time, it also has the same concept of internal power, which is broad in terms of humanity. It is a common understanding of humanity. This is a common understanding of the differences between people and people.

From a broader perspective, human rights are not only related to individuals, but also reach a broader range of areas. In this question, Chinese traditional thinking also provides very rich ideological resources. “Shangshu” put forward a request for “cooperation with all countries”, and advocated the principle of “confrontation with each other and harmony” to coordinate the relationship between the political entities of different countries across the country. The “Talent” proposes ideas such as “taking the whole country as one” and “the whole country as public”, and uses this as the specific content of the “big common” of the whole country. During the Song and Ming dynasties, Zhang Xiu further proposed the concept of “respect for the world”, which included a fantasy of “every-long war” as the German philosopher Immanuel Kant said. From the common goal of unity and the whole country to the peace of the world, the overall goal of these concepts is to focus on the entire nation, thereby building a harmonious human lifestyle cooperation.

Baobao.com 

Yang Guorong delivered a tenet lecture online at the International Academic Seminar on November 20. The host provided pictures

China News Service reporter: Compared with the traditional Chinese concept of human rights, what are the differences in modern Eastern human rights thinking? Why do you say the difference between human rights and the reality is the opportunity to take a break when you evaluate human rights. During a nap, she had a dream. Is there a problem that needs special attention at the time?

Yang Guorong: The mainstream politics in modern Eastern countries believes that they stand at the commanding heights of morality and value, and their condition is to raise the human rights and sentimental status to a high position. It can be said that the human rights and the way to achieve relevant goals. This is the main one, but it cannot be regarded as the goal of oneself.

How is the real meaning of human rights? Reality is a problem that needs to be paid attention to tomorrow. In terms of reality, human rights are now people-oriented, that is, truly putting concern for people first. If this basic point is left, all human rights words are empty words and have no actual meaning.

In this regard, China’s traditional civilization has also done a lot of exploration. In traditional meanings<a In the field of estimating the ability to be able to be able to be able to judge whether a person can "pay" and "capable" does not depend on what he says, what he clamors, what he blew, or what he proposed, but what he made in the actual political practice and what he showed his talents. Zhang Changzheng, a political philosopher of the Han Dynasty, pointed out: "Works must make good people. "Why do you know how good it is if you don't try it? "This highlights the need for "trying things", that is, to use the political process to assess a person's talents. This must have a practical foundation and is divided into abstract emotional views.

On May 8, 2017, China’s first large-scale panoramic drama “Teacher’s Table” passed its own 322 performance commemorationBaozhuangappJapan. China News Service reporter Mao Jianjun

When we say that Chinese traditional thinking, the “tradition” here refers to both modern traditions and modern and modern traditions. From modern and modern traditions, demands have a high emphasis on the community route. The community route is one of the main situations of modern political reality. href=”https://twsugardaddy.org/”>Inclusive networkIt asks to come from the crowd and go to the crowd. Through this method, listen to the opinions of the crowd, care about the sufferings of the crowd, and finally give it a practical benefit to the people.

China News Service reporter: The minutiae thinking is the focus of China’s traditional political thinking. How should we distinguish between “minutiae” and “minutiae”, in this areaSweetheart GardenWhy is it very important for understanding the concept of “human rights”?

Yang Guorong:In the political field, the two people and the people are often regarded as two clear forms of Wei: “The people” seem to be regarded as In terms of political management concepts, “gold-based” is often regarded as the “time” initiative of the predecessor. In fact, whether it is “gold-based” or “gold-based” needs to be sorted out.

One of the original meanings of gents is the rule of the people, which includes “What will happen next?” to allow gents to participate in social management or political operations. However, from an actual perspective, the lack of practical feasibility of social management is clearly lacking in the actual situation. From the perspective of political practice, compared with “golden master”, “golden master” can include a wider connotation and have a modern form. There are differences from the understanding of tradition, and the “common” in modern meaning is often given to the historical content of the people first. From a theoretical perspective, this political implementation method involves both responsiveness and feasibility. Exploring the true way of realizing the supremacy of the people is related to the question of whether social management can realize human rights. Its fair direction is the combination of civil and civil. Combine